Every portfolio manager wishes to construct optimum portfolios that are less risky, profitable & with less investment. This is going to be a uphill task, In this post we have demonstrated Portfolio Risk Optimization processes & tools.
Optimize Portfolio Risk How to? Process
Portfolio Manager can optimize[Reduce Risk, Improve Returns] portfolio by doing:-
1) Conscious allocation of economic capital.
2) Trade off risk and return.
Optimize Portfolio Risk How to? Tools are:-
| Tool | Measures | Helps in deciding | ||
| Incremental VaR | Effective Portfolio Risk, after adding a new instrument. | Whether to add a new instrument to portfolio? | ||
| Marginal VaR | Effective Portfolio Risk, after increasing unit investment in existing instrument. | Whether to invest more in existing instrument? | ||
| Component VaR | Effective Portfolio Risk, decomposed between instruments. | Whether to retain/drop an instrument? | ||
Marginal VaR
Measures change in portfolio VaR resulting from adding additional dollar to an instrument(ith).
Marginal VaR of ith component is ∆VaRi = α σip/σp =(VaR/P * Bi)
Component VaR
Measures VaR contribution of every instrument to Portfolio VaR.
Component VaR of ith component is ∆VaRi = (VaR * Bi * wi)
Incremental VaR
Measures VaR contribution of a new instrument to Portfolio VaR.
Incremental VaR of NewInstrumenta = VaRp+a - VaRp
Optimization Tools: Implementation
Following Steps are followed:-
1) Calculate Instrument Statistics[Return,StdDev]
2) Calculate Portfolio Statistics[Weighing,Return,StdDev]
3) Calculate Related Statistics[Betas].
4) Calculate VaR [Marginal VaR, Componenet VaR, Incremental VaR]
Instrument Return:-
From the historical returns obtain returns for every date.
PortfolioReturn= Return(PortfolioValue=(PortfolioWeight*Instrument))
Incremental VaR
Measures VaR contribution of a new instrument to Portfolio VaR.
Incremental VaR of NewInstrumenta = VaRp+a - VaRp
Optimization Tools: Implementation
Following Steps are followed:-
1) Calculate Instrument Statistics[Return,StdDev]
2) Calculate Portfolio Statistics[Weighing,Return,StdDev]
3) Calculate Related Statistics[Betas].
4) Calculate VaR [Marginal VaR, Componenet VaR, Incremental VaR]
Instrument Return:-
| InstrumentsValue(past value) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | I2 | I3 | I4 | I5 | I6 | I7 | I8 | I9 | I10 | |
| 01-Jan-2001 | 2.3 | 2 | 3 | 23.3 | 12 | 13 | 3 | 23.3 | 12 | 13 |
| 02-Jan-2001 | 1.4 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 32.1 | 21.6 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 32.1 | 21 |
| 03-Jan-2001 | 21.6 | 2.1 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 11.5 | 2.2 | 12.4 | 1.5 |
| 04-Jan-2001 | 21.1 | 12 | 13 | 21.1 | 22 | 31 | 21.1 | 22 | 31 | 19 |
| 05-Jan-2001 | 2.15 | 2.12 | 3.21 | 12.51 | 2.21 | 3.12 | 2.15 | 2.21 | 13.1 | 2.34 |
| 06-Jan-2001 | 11.95 | 21.22 | 13.11 | 11.95 | 12.22 | 31.11 | 12.95 | 21.21 | 3.21 | 1.23 |
| InstrReturns | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | I2 | I3 | I4 | I5 | I6 | I7 | I8 | I9 | I10 | |
| 01-Jan-2001 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| 02-Jan-2001 | -0.3913 | 1.55 | -0.13333 | -0.92274 | 1.675 | 0.661538 | -0.13333 | -0.92274 | 1.675 | 0.61538 |
| 03-Jan-2001 | 14.428 | -0.58823 | 0.269230 | 1.277777 | -0.93146 | -0.84259 | 3.423076 | 0.222222 | -0.61370 | -0.9285 |
| 04-Jan-2001 | -0.023 | 4.714285 | 2.939393 | 4.1463415 | 9 | 8.117647 | 0.834782 | 9 | 1.5 | 11.6666 |
| 05-Jan-2001 | -0.898 | -0.82333 | -0.753077 | -0.407109 | -0.899545 | -0.89935 | -0.89810 | -0.89954 | -0.57741 | -0.8768 |
| 06-Jan-2001 | 4.55813 | 9.00943 | 3.084112 | -0.044764 | 4.529411 | 8.971153 | 5.023255 | 8.597285 | -0.75496 | -0.4743 |
do i = 1 to 10;
CurrValue = InstrumentsHistory [,i];
PreValue = Lag(InstrumentsHistory [,i],1);
Returns = ((CurrValue-PreValue)/PreValue);
InstrReturns = InstrReturns||Returns;
end;
Portfolio Returns:-| PortfolioWeight | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | W5 | W6 | W7 | W8 | W9 | W10 | |
| P1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| P2 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| P3 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| P4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PortReturns | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | |
| 01-Jan-2001 | . | . | . | . |
| 02-Jan-2001 | -0.170554 | -0.209743 | -0.194645 | -0.79926 |
| 03-Jan-2001 | -0.721441 | -0.410103 | -0.630728 | 3.1428571 |
| 04-Jan-2001 | 4.9432177 | 2.2017417 | 3.8053528 | 1.0656285 |
| 05-Jan-2001 | -0.653875 | -0.708885 | -0.669671 | -0.649812 |
| 06-Jan-2001 | 1.0226959 | 1.0006229 | 0.8950031 | 1.0158388 |
PortfolioValue = (PortfolioWeight[i,]#InstrumentsHistory)[,+];
PrePortfolioValue = Lag(PortfolioValue,1);
CurrPortReturns = ((PortfolioValue-PrePortfolioValue)/PrePortfolioValue);
PortReturns = PortReturns||CurrPortReturns ;
end;
PortStdev=Sqrt(Var(PortfolioReturn))
| PortStdev | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 |
| 2.3743983 | 1.2105273 | 1.8782371 | 1.6012189 |
PortfolioBeta= Corr p,i * (InstrStdDev/PortStdev)
| PortBeta | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | I2 | I3 | I4 | I5 | I6 | I7 | I8 | I9 | I10 | |
| P1 | -0.272492 | 1.3931548 | 0.4549135 | 0.2571137 | 1.7647082 | 1.6598638 | 0.2099907 | 1.2973967 | 0.103451 | 2.0616687 |
| P2 | 1.6034421 | 3.0741911 | 1.1897248 | 0.8405295 | 3.1152606 | 3.6627218 | 1.0297197 | 2.9689203 | 0.1014574 | 3.5945565 |
| P3 | 1.0334214 | 1.9813219 | 0.7667798 | 0.5417228 | 2.0077912 | 2.360631 | 0.6636563 | 1.9134746 | 0.0653895 | 2.3166983 |
| P4 | 3.2325549 | 0.2582333 | 0.5621477 | 1.1437981 | -0.261683 | 0.3076701 | 0.9341662 | 2.2445145 | -0.383511 | -1.019062 |
Measure of relationship between Portfolio loss & Instrument loss.
Let's Calculate VaR:-
MVar:-
| PortMVar | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | I2 | I3 | I4 | I5 | I6 | I7 | I8 | I9 | I10 | |
| P1 | . | 0.2507888 | 0.0818913 | 0.0462843 | 0.317674 | . | . | . | . | . |
| P2 | 0.1510749 | . | . | 0.079194 | 0.2935171 | 0.3450984 | . | . | . | 0.338676 |
| P3 | . | . | 0.1164923 | 0.0823007 | 0.3050318 | . | 0.1008254 | . | . | . |
| P4 | 0.3948454 | 0.0315423 | 0.0686644 | 0.139711 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
For Portfolio P1 investing in I4 is less risky.
ComponentVar:-
| PortCVar | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | I2 | I3 | I4 | I5 | I6 | I7 | I8 | I9 | I10 | |
| P1 | . | 0.3307904 | 0.2160292 | 0.2441962 | 1.257036 | . | . | . | . | . |
| P2 | 0.3882021 | . | . | 0.4069936 | 0.7542216 | 0.4433825 | . | . | . | 0.4351309 |
| P3 | . | . | 0.2880389 | 0.4069936 | 1.1313324 | . | 0.1246504 | . | . | . |
| P4 | 1.5528084 | 0.0413488 | 0.1800243 | 0.7325885 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
For Portfolio P1 more risk contribution is done by I5 and less contribution is done by I3.
Incremental VaR:-
Full Revaluation should be used to calculate this (Varp+a - Vara)
Conclustion:-
Using these three VaR measures portfolio manager can decide on optimizing portfolio by reducing risk. But this is only one end of the coin :). Follow this space to do it more effectively.
No comments:
Post a Comment